OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
153975882

These streets have no sidewalks, why did you add them?

153875069

And if you wash your car every day it looks clean, but it's a pain to do it!

What you are describing is a form of tagging for the renderer. We are not in the business of making a pretty map. We are assembling geographic data that can be used by anyone, for free, to make a map that suits their needs. By connecting landuse to roads, you are contributing incorrect data (because you are suggesting that roadbed is actually commercial/park/retail) and making it very difficult to edit.

What looks clean is subjective. What's easiest to map, less so. Do not continue mapping in this way.

58392823

You've got a Phoenix address in Georgia there way/583381189

153800888

"blue_turf" is not a distinct surface value. The color is already reflected in the colour tag.
The common name of the field that should be displayed on OpenStreetMap is Lyle Smith Field. Unless you have some sort of documentation proving otherwise, do not "correct" the name again. You will be referred to the Data Working Group.

153819030

Awesome work adding/updating all these tracks! I get really frustrated trying to fix TIGER geometry.

144850198

way/1229199662: Prophecy?

142692716

Looks like you tagged the entirety of way/458911987 as covered.

153496028

It looks like the URLs have the store number in them. Possible to extract refs?

153475364

Please submit changes before moving to a new area, especially across the country.

153350272

Then when asked to explain your edits, you should do so without fail. What did you do in this changeset? ("Look at it" is not a sufficient explanation.)

153429542

It is not. The stadium is already named properly. You are tagging the field, not the stadium.

153436397

The scrub area shouldn't overlap the river area, as much of a pain as it is to separate the two.

153426981

That is the name of the stadium, not the field. Reverted.

153421379

Don't do this! This is tagging for the renderer and not allowed on OSM.

153323382

It's not. Someone used the wrong tag.

110883406

Any legit reason not to?

134753958

The names are back.

152935447

The wiki is vague because there hasn't been a proposal to standardize fire station tagging. With that said, you tagged the building and grounds just how I'd do it.

152820403

I didn't mean to upload the nodes with PARCEL and POOLSQFT tags. Oops

146690950

Reverting old edits only gets problematic if there are intermediate edits. This generally isn't the case for deleted features, for obvious reasons.

You can undelete features in JOSM using the Undelete plugin. See here: osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete