A veteran mapper has explained to you why you can't "authorize" anyone to do anything, yet you've once again deleted these features. I've restored them again, and have contacted the Data Working Group.

Please respond to the changeset comment here: changeset/99797891

The driveway you deleted was already marked as private. This isn't a matter of authorization. These features were deleted previously by Map_Manager, which makes me suspect that you are the same person, especially as this is your first changeset. I have reverted your deletions.

Also note that copying or even checking against Google Maps is a violation of copyright.

The values you have specified for width=* are invalid. The comment would probably make more sense as a value of description=*.

balrog-kun expanded all predirectionals and suffixes, but just assumed that letters were always supposed to be directions. This is still an issue all across the US, though someone did fix all occurrences of this error in California and I've fixed many across the country.

Ah, alright. I added that to the damn page. (Throwing that name around makes me sound irritated.) Hope I didn't set back that part of the project too far— I'll just say the area still needs more mapping from now on.

I hadn't heard of damn before! It's really cool. It would be perfect for adding all the new houses that have sprung up and conflating addresses.

Wollten Sie tatsächlich ein TIGER-Tag hinzufügen?

Just a curiosity: I see gpx files being used when you add sidewalks. Are you walking these sidewalks and then adding them? I tend to just use imagery, but it seems like you map sidewalks in more detail.

Can you check some of these numbers? Just glancing at this one house seems to be tagged with addr:housenumber=2.

Check way/801325753. It's tagged building=g.

Can you check on way/751303693? It seems unlikely there's a building here.

I can't imagine this building was meant to be added here.

Looks like the location is messed up. I doubt there's a clinic at Null Island.

Can you explain the value winter_road=1? yes seems like a more appropriate value.

Can you explain the use of ice_road=yes on node/3783475293?

Are you sure this is an ice road? It seems more likely to be a low-quality TIGER road.

Some of the service roads added have an access of value of "customers`" (notice the backtick `). This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!

Some of the service roads added have an access of value of "customers`" (notice the backtick `). This is not recognized by most data consumers. Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!