>so now im getting blocked because I forgot to reply to one random comment?

It's not a big deal. This sort of block isn't a punishment, it's just the best way we have to ensure you leave a comment.

(Perhaps past zero-day blocks shouldn't be so prominently visible on the profile...)

It seems you have had multiple disputes over what counts as an automated edit. You still believe that the nature of your own exempts you from the approval process. I believe it has been conclusively demonstrated that this is never the case. It is not that the rules are being applied selectively to you, it's that a complaint has been registered against you. You are welcome and encouraged to report undocumented imports by other users.

You don't need to tag something as a link to use the destination key

I don't think roundabouts are considered links. When I mapped them as links someone told me otherwise. Maybe the guidance has changed.

access=private is more appropriate for such a situation. access=no is more for things like military installations and paths that are closed due to erosion. Garden variety prohibitions on trespassing should use private access instead.

Please stop gluing landuse to roads. It is incorrect and makes it harder to maintain.

Elevation 835 is correct

Please check spelling of name and addr:state

I added some landcover just for you, "Land Owner". You think your property rights extend to our servers and vandalize them accordingly. Very immature and disrespectful of you.

This is not a fight you will win. We have seen all your tactics a hundred times before. It will amount to nothing more than a massive waste of your time, and a small waste of time for a great number of people.

Mapping your property in more detail is petulant, perhaps, but it also means you'll be wasting more of your time next time you try to destroy our data. Just more opportunities to give you pause.

Good luck getting a response from the auto-generated Map builder account. Don't know why Bing let this through.

Maybe next time, you should add buildings according to reality. This building is extremely poorly digitized and should be removed. way/1122960425

I agree that hotels should be mapped as sites if they consist of more than one building.

In the meantime, one technique is to remove all the extra tags, then perform the dupe check. You can then purge the existing objects before uploading.

The numbers would be more appropriate in ref=* than name=*

Island Park is already on the map elsewhere. Mack's Inn is an old locality. Sorry for not being more clear. Zoom out and look to the south.

Wrong place

Please don't connect landuse to roads! It is incorrect topology and makes it harder to maintain.

Just noticed I've commented here before. You surveyed 712 houses and uploaded in a single changeset. Now that's impressive.

"Gold Steet" on houses vs. Gold Drive on road, which is correct? way/761870064

OSM is not a tract map. Please revert this edit. Instead, consider using JOSM geometry tools to "shrink-wrap" the plots and generate landuse polygons that are suitable for OSM.

Copyright infringement. What you are describing is called copyright infringement.
In any case, the business should probably not be added to OSM. It is run out of someone's house. If I cannot walk in to this private residence during some sort of opening hours unannounced then it is not suitable for OSM.