Hi,
My understanding is that a feature directly under another feature (in this case a bridges tagged layer=1) should be one layer less than layer=1, which is layer=0, which in it's absence, is implied as layer=0.

Way: Utrechtsebaan (7474878) is directly under twelve features, bridges tagged as layer=1. Thus, I assume that with no layer tag at all, layer=0 is implied. Way:Utrechtsebaan (7474878) is not tagged as a tunnel.

My apologies if I'm wrong but I can't see why.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reinstated the Public Right of Way as it is still a highway no matter its state of repair. There looks like there is a gap in the central crash barrier to allow for crossing.

What you could do is contact Suffolk County Council and complain about the state of repair of the highway.

Levington Heath, both sides of the A14, is Open Access Land, so you are allowed open access on foot to the whole area; it's on the Ordnance Survey map.

Regards Bernard.

I've removed several duplicated highway sections, re-warnings above

Hi, Some of the warnings above need to be corrected.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are several warnings given above regarding this changeset. You dragged some highways out of alignment, which I've corrected. they were the 7 crossing_ways:highway-highway.

There also seem to be some problems with the building you've added or altered, which I don't have the knowledge to correct. Perhaps you could review them.

Regards Bernard.

No response, so I've reinstated the woods that appear on imagery.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you explain what your intention is with this tagging to an existing highway node, please? As such, it doesn't make any sense.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap..

The AED is positioned within the garage outline. Which looks like it's not accessible to the public, as access+yes implies? Can you please correct your map position and tags to something logical? If not then the POI ought to be removed.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The pub is already mapped as Way: Sussex Arms (311904776) and Relation: The Sussex Arms (8757463). Thus I've added your data to the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Way: 376836631 was a PRoW, Hingham FP 1. Anyway, there's no reason to delete features that are there for all to see.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If something needs correcting, please correct it, not just delete it. You even deleted a public footpath. The tracks can all be seen on available imagery so are valid feature to be included on OSM. Thus I've reverted these changes.

Regards Bernard.

Untagged node removed as it serves no purpose.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see the steps were removed from the path you corrected, do the steps exist? The imagery suggests they do exist, so they should be reinstated.

Regards Bernard.

Many warnings above

Fiction names removed

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I cannot see any building around here that might be the Cafe. The OSM database holds only ground truth that is verifiable to anyone who may pass by. If the cafe is an on the ground feature perhaps I could help in mapping it? I can't find a website, is there one?

If the cafe is not a permanent feature, then it should be removed from OSM.

Regards Bernard

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've tweaked the building outline.

Regards Bernard.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The Business is not the whole building, thus I've reverted the altered building tags.

I've added the website to your POI.

Regards Bernard.

Address corrected to OSM practice.

Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It looks like the ways you modified should not have been joined to the central service road. They are, as can be seen from imagery, aircraft parking positions, not service roads. I've amended the map.

Regards Bernard.