No, incorrect, that's what noname=yes is for. The name is only the name, never the highway number.

That's a problem with the validator. References are not street names and don't go in the name tag. You can safely tell your validator of choice to ignore it if the address is right, just doesn't match the name of the street, it's a common and known shortcoming with most validators on US addresses.

It's worth including the street names on sidewalks so that walking directions call out streetnames.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176680384

This got added seemingly on a drainage culvert; what's this camera mounted on so the position can be refined?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176641820

Yeah, no worries, it's an easy fix. Sliding the errant one onto the good one (in the web editor "id") or selecting the errant node(s) first, then the good node, then select merge if you're using JOSM. In this case I saw the good one and merged the mistaken one onto the good one.

In either case, thanks for helping out OpenStreetMap!

This got added to the map in the middle of the southbound traffic lane...where's this camera mounted?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176628946

double half would mean there's an entrance gate and an exit gate; half gates tend to be typical in Oklahoma, where there's only an entrance gate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176538347

Streetnames for sidewalks are very helpful for pedestrian directions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176519302

Don't forget the street names!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176469765

Don't forget the street names!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176469765

Don't forget the street names!

I believe you, it's just been 10 years since I was in the neighborhood to see it firsthand.

Awesome, glad to know.

Is the street still open at the other end? Looks like the gate and the access for the gate should be mapped but the street itself doesn't seem to be private, looking at it from the top down.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176451032

Awesome! Just wanting to make sure since we do occasionally get folks who weren't quite so quick to pick up on that nuance. Glad to have the help!

If you're copying the names from Bing Maps, we can't accept those due to copyright. Tracing from the Aerial photography is OK as OSM has permission for that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176289811

Tulsa Parks Authority is showing this as Tuckabache Trail, ending at Riverparks Westbank Trail as of today.

Yeah, backward compatibility for software that hasn't been updated in almost 20 years. It's deprecated.

There's also Interstate 505 in Portland. It's *never* been signed.

Route refs are deprecated in favor of relations. Congressionally designated isn't signed, and considering there's talks of removing the Martin Luther King Junior Expressway in Tulsa, I doubt I 42 is happening at all. I 444 is congressionally designated but hasn't been signed since the 70s.