Excellent! I just tweaked it a little with the Strava heatmap source in JOSM. Still an average though. I appreciate your efforts. If not today, going to be a few nice days this week :)

I've got another area in PVSP that needs some good survey. There is a trail that begins in EC at the end of Red Stag Ct and continues down into Ilchester. We're trying to update that area for the new PTAP Traverse trail. Could you take a look with your high-accuracy GPS?

way/920975061

Hello there. Per your block by the DWG, please don't change these highway classifications without discussion with local mappers. We did a big review of Maryland roads' classification several years ago and they should not be changed unless there is substantative change to the road geometry since then. Post a message on the talk-us list with any proposed upgrades prior to editing: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Meanwhile, this changeset has been reverted in changeset/101513133#map=15/39.3446/-76.6351

Hello there. Per your block by the DWG, please don't change these highway classifications without discussion with local mappers. We did a big review of Maryland roads' classification several years ago and they should not be changed unless there is substantative change to the road geometry since then. Post a message on the talk-us list with any proposed upgrades prior to editing: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Meanwhile, this changeset has been reverted in changeset/101512265

DUGA, if you're cleaning up issues by another user, or really anything, try to be specific in your changeset comments. It helps resolve conflicts!

This is great work! Nice GPS too. Today I met with PVSP head ranger Joe and FPVSP management to get more people that manage the park involved with the mapping of it, via trail naming, area naming, access, etc. Looks like you're committed to doing great trail mapping at PVSP. Would you want to get involved in a future mapathon?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101372608

Agreed here. The way should not be separated unless there is physical separation.

Reverted here. changeset/101016949

Hello there. Please do not convert ramps to motorway. These edits will be rolled back. If you want to make a case in the talk-us community that ramps should be classified as links, feel free, but until then, please do not make edits like this.

Hello there. Please explain your reasoning for upgrading these roads to trunk, especially Charles Street. It is well established that only partial access control highways are trunks. You've also broken some of the relations here along the bridges over the beltway. Please be more careful editing. We'll have to roll back this changeset, as well as some others that are causing routing troubles. Please consider reaching out to the community in a comment before making drastic edits to existing roads.

Hello there. I see you've been continually changing this section of 83 from a motorway link to a motorway. Why are you doing this? It is classified as a link because it is an exit ramp from one interstate to another. If you noticed, one of the previous editors cited the wiki. Did you read the article? If you disagree with a tag, please reach out in a comment, don't just change it.

This is definitely more of a 'for fun' edit. The wikidata does have a coordinate location so I think that qualifies, right?

Deleted this one. It is generally safe to remove these unused lines so long as all shared nodes are kept.

Thanks, I took care of it by removing the unused line.

Here's a photo of the signs indicating the closure, if you're interested, taken by me yesterday. https://i.imgur.com/jkYKdlA.jpg

Hey there. I am experimenting a bit with that access:wikidata tag. The idea was to essentially cite that the trail was indeed closed per that wikidata organization. Probably a bit too much of an abstraction though. I didn't add operator:wikidata because the trail is informal and was built illegally, thus not really operated by anyone. The "Closed" in the name is also not customary (access=no handles it). The trail has no posted name at all, but locals call it "Roxy". The intent here is to indicate to would be editors that might change or delete this (as had happened prior to the revert), to not do that. I added the access=no, too. What do you suggest to ensure other mappers don't simply remove the access tag?

This area is something we should discuss further. In OSM there are two concepts for mapping an area. Landuse and Land Cover. Landuse is typically defined by humans, legal boundaries, residential areas, parks, etc. Land cover are natural things, woods, water, grassland. This feature is a wooded area, not a park. It *covers* the park proper, which has well defined boundaries. The green shaded outline delineates the park boundary, and the lite green fill denotes park land but the woods (dark green) is meant to cover wooded parts of the park to show an additional level of detail.

Rolled this one back per our chat this evening. Here you can see the edit with the access tag changeset/99009043

Hey there. Did you mean to add amenity = fuel for this line that makes up one of the city boundaries? way/41008778 Figured it was a mistake. Thanks!

Awesome! I saw the trailhead of this from the WB&A but never got to ride it. I did add all this protected land to the map around here to help people find where they can explore without trespassing.