OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
174217927

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174217927

174217743

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174217743

174217104

#TIP: street names are spelled out since software has a hard time with abbreviated words. Otherwise the edit looks good.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174217104

174215738

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174215738

174215551

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174215551

174211259

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174211259

174211018

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174211018

174210785

#TIP: square building by selecting the outline they just type a "q". Also street names are spelled because software has a hard time unabbreviating.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210785

174210480

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210480

174210345

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210345

174210061

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210061

174210014

Landuse is not intended for building. Instead change the building tag from yes to retail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174210014

174176132

These devices should be stand alone nodes. I removed it from the street way. It does seem like a strange place for a camera compared to others that have been added.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174176132

174131158

#TIP: It would help if you could add the name for the sculpture and artist if you know it. I did notice you placed it near the Piloti.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174131158

174078160

One suggestion, instead of adding a node to an existing feature, use a stand alone node. I look for the pole's shadows to place the node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174078160

173944048

Done

173944048

Thanks. I had looked up the address and it sounded like it was still there, plus the imagery made it look new. I'll remove the building and features around it.

173944048

Are you talking about the bldg next to Claudia Driscoll Park?

174029845

I'm not sure sidepath is the right tag. Is there a physical path that bikes can use, if so, I'd add the path and show bicycle=yes. Can bicycles and pedestrians use the gate? If so you can access for them. See bicycle=use_sidepath and access=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174029845

174007265

I went ahead and deleted the SEO entire changeset because of the dragged nodes, but thanks for attempting to fix. (I have little patience for SEO crappy edits)