Reverted due to broken road geometry and addition of historical nonexistent roads changeset/172370101

None of these buildings are rendering now because they're tagged incorrectly - each building should have building=yes. The relation containing all the buildings is incorrect and should be deleted.

Why not just split the buildings before you upload them and save someone else a job later, there's nothing wrong with doing things right first time. I don't see why I should be the one to split these, when you're the one importing these inaccurate buildings that are going to cause problems down the line when other users go to survey addresses here with streetcomplete, for example.

Thanks!

Why do this? Someone is going to have to come along later and split these buildings into semidetached houses, it's easier if places with semis or terraces are just left blank to be drawn from scratch instead of having to remove or fix msft ai buildings first...

Hi, was ref=TQ 3133 8823 actually signed on this substation? I removed it because I thought it was incorrect to have a grid reference set as the ref, but there seems to be several substations tagged like this in London and Southend, so if it was wrong to remove it let me know

Hi, was adding not:brand:wikidata=Q922344 (i.e. not Morrisons) to the petrol station named Morrisons an error, or is this actually not a Morrisons petrol station?

I have a very strong opinion that a clear corridor or embankment isn't grounds for a closed railway to be present in OSM, but that's a discussion for another time :)

I went ahead and added building=train_station and abandoned=yes to the former train station building, so that should be much clearer now what it is.

Geniunely, what is the point of mass-importing microsoft ai buildings if you don't do any checks for quality????? Look at this social facility way/1426417390 in what world is it acceptable to import a building shape that innacurate from microsoft AI buildings???? You're creating a lot of work for other contributors who are going to have to come along later and clear this mess up!!! Additionally, adding 'clumped' buildings is totally unhelpful, like this one way/1426417426 which should be 5 detached houses, not one massive blob!! Someone's just going to have to delete and redraw a majority of these semidetached and terraced buildings to create a map of usable quality! Have you ever tried using streetcomplete to survey addresses where all you are shown is dodgy building footprints that bear little resemblance to reality??? PLEASE consider the quality of the buildings you are importing, *some* people have standards...

Hi, I was trying to deduplicate the tags that were also on the nearby Ardglass station node (11009056412), but maybe it could do with building=train_station + abandoned=yes. (and perhaps a clearer name). A lot of this historical info in my opinion is better placed in OHM, for example the branch line here is tagged as 'abandoned' despite being closed in 1950 and there is likely no physical remains of the track/trackbed etc. It would be nice to have some kind of tagging standardisation for (extant) historic railway infrastructure, because there is a lot of overlap in the use of disused: abandoned: razed: and historic: currently

This is unbelievable... I have no words...

Hi, thanks for updating these roads, do you know what road number has been assigned? If it's an A road it should be marked as primary, if it's a B road then secondary. If you know the number it you could add it under ref for all the sections of road it applies to :)

Why would I put a comment on a changeset that is nothing to do with me or the concerns I have?

What do you mean April 10th Mankind is free???

I'm not complaining about the quality of your edits, just that it's hard to understand what you are changing on the map with all the spam in changeset comments about 11oz silver and links to AI written blogposts

Hi, why do all of your changesets have a 'blog' tag linking to "ministry of health" substack articles full of crazy nonsense??? This is not relevant to OSM!!!

Hi, just to let you know you deleted two large natural=wood multipolygons which were part of Epping Forest, I have restored them in changeset/170455915

I'm fairly sure nominatim does support official_name, see searching for lastminute.com London Eye...
In my opinion OSM should mirror Wikipedia in keeping the common names of stadiums instead of renaming articles or OSM objects when they get a new sponsorship names

Leyton Orient is your club? Have you checked out my 3D mapping of the stadium in F4map? https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.5600475&lon=-0.0123069&zoom=18&camera.theta=57.655&camera.phi=-118.619

Nobody actually uses this name in everyday speech, in my opinion Brisbane Road is the common name and should be used for osm.wiki/Tag:name=, with BetWright stadium only tagged as official_name

Hi, why have you used addr:housename instead of name for the name of this community centre? And what is the meaning of addr:street=Unnamed Road... this is not correct tagging...