Logical sense is what makes that situation different.
Mapping landuse= over areas which already have higher detailed features mapped is duplicated and wasted efforts. All the necessary information can be derived from these higher detailed features.
Blindly mapping something without fully understand why that is being mapped is not a good approach to mapping. You need to understand what and why you map something.

It's really unnecessary to map these landuse areas when all the buildings inside are already mapped. landuse information can be inferred from the building types.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166046420

Hello.
Please do not tag curbs just for the hell of it without performing actual in-person survey. It's virtually impossible to tell from the satellite imagery whether a curb is lower or not.
However, on a bunch of curbs here you tagged them as tactile_paving=no when you can clearly see red plastic bumper plates.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166045877

Also, you tagged crossing:island=no on a kerb..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176

Hello.
Are you sure those kerbs inside of kbcc are lowered? Satellite imagery doesn't show that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166039176

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you add way/1384807804 when there's no crosswalk there?

For way way/1083318697 you added "footway:crossing:markings=zebra". I don't think that's a thing...🤔
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166006477

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag these crosswalks as uncontrolled, when there are clearly visible traffic signals?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165986656

Yes, please re-think that strategy. Most changes should be geographically localized. There's no reason for a single changeset to delete random nodes all over the world.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165966809

Hello.
You added a path way/1384488745 and tagged with surface=plastic. Is that accurate?
You also tagged a building as being 13 meters in height. What is the source of that information?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165963741

Hello.
Please note, when adding street names of features, they should be fully spelled out, not abbreviated. You can read more about this at osm.wiki/Abbreviations
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165960077

Hello.
Are you sure this is 30' wide? It seems to be 2-2.5cars wide, so would be ~20'
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165959951

If I remember correctly, some of those overpasses had different height signs for different lanes because of archways. Maybe not this specific, but some in the area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165951264

Are those legitimately "no sidewalk" in a legal sense or would it be sidewalk with different surface like "grass"? Because these disconnected segments are useless for pedestrian routing...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165941516

Hello.
As mentioned in your previous edit, phone numbers can't contain ( ) and websites must have http:// or https://.
If you are tagging "credit_card" and "debit_card", tagging mastercard and visa is redundant.

What is the name and address of the added convenience store?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165918148

Hello.
Please note that as documented on phone=* phone numbers should be separated only by - or space, not ( ) or any other characters.
Additionally, website urls must contain http:// or https:// as appropriate.
What is the meaning of "branch=Provided" tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165917953

Hello.
Please note under any circumstances you CAN NOT use Google maps to add data to OSM. This is a copyright violation and breaking Terms of Service that you agreed to with OSM and Google.

The address and location on their website is not the same what you added. Their location is in Manhattan in The Chrysler Building. You added POI in Brooklyn.

It should be made such🙂 and with anything else that has multiple locations.
That's the point of that tag

Hello.
Please provide some supporting evidence that this business is actually at this location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165906618

Hello.
Good attempt at fixing this😅, but in OSM values are always in the lower case (Other than proper names).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165905364

Hello.
I noticed that you tagged these crosswalks as crossing:island=yes. Note that crosswalks should be tagged like that if the crossing island is included in the that way. If crossing islands are mapped as separate ways, then the crosswalks should be mapped as crossing:island=no.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165904645