thanks for fixing it.

looks good, you could also add the marked crossing to the node in the center or continue the path to the other side of the street even if there is no sidewalk yet to connect it with. Looks good. thanks for editing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179375640

"PNT" does not seam to be a real name. usually if a way has no name we just leave it blank. also the path intersects the water stream if it is a level crossing it can be tagged as a ford and listed as intermittent like the stream is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179773753

looks like you deleted the lit=yes . did street lights get removed? also the check date rather than being removed can be left just update it to the date in which you last checked it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179811259

If you are using the ID editor you can square up the building by right clicking and squaring or using the "q" key. you could also set building=house for any houses. there are also building=garage and building=shed if you want to add them. thanks for editing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179827248

barriers have been present for several years. I removed the route relation so hopefully it looks less inviting

I had to add back the way you deleted.
changeset/179565589
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178748307

I added it back way/1486789303
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178193866

someone probably dragged it by mistake. instead of deleting it you can place a note and someone will come fix it. osm.wiki/Notes
you can also look at the changset history to see what changes have been made.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178193866

Hello,
you did not have to delete it you could have moved the end to the correct location. other wise it looks good. thanks for making the correction.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177658631

sidewalks can still have bike designated
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176811133

you can find the crossing data here:
https://www.fra.dot.gov/railcrossinglocator
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177006748

can you verify which crossing is 096202N
each crossing has a blue ENS tag. they can be mapped as ref:fra_crossing=096202N
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177006748

looks good thanks for the edit
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176923946

you deleted a transformer did it go away?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179271624

this is great news and there was no need to delete it. you also did not add the bridge tag back to the new line you put in. so the trail is not on a bridge.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179283053

before removing things ask yourself can it be tagged another way. I added back the line you deleted. i has been added back as railway=abandoned
changeset/179562116
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179420725

the details for this route is primarily behind a pay wall.

these lines are better suited for Open Historical Map. If the line or right of way is obliterated by buildings or roads it has no reason being on Open Street Map. if the right of way or line can be seen in the ground that is exceptionable by me but by many other mappers that is still historical.

you might want to add this comment to a note=* within the polygon.