Hi,
relation/20274479 - heath has a problem Outer ways cannot share segments. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=169.37918&lat=-45.19754&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

I'd delete the relation. Then put the tag 'natural=heath' and be done. No need for as relation at all.

way/1483880053 has a node or 2 that are causing problems...
See way/1483880053

Name is for name only, not a description eg 'Terrace Houses'.

relation/19448184 deleted - shared segments.

What is the 'Smallwood Estate'?

Looks to me like these group of building are individual properties that can be purchased individually .. with individual; addresses. Perhaps they were developed as a lot but once sold this 'estate' ceased to be?

In any case the relation has no outer so it does not make OSM sense.

Deleted relation/19927055 - 2 members both inners.

Errr No.

Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments.

In principle the surface parking would be part of the mall too.

I'd put a simple way around the hole outside of the block and put the tags on that .. depending on the OSM definition of 'mall'?
Alternative? Put a simple way around the outside of all of the buildings and tags on that.

Thoughts?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The multipolygon grass relation is in error ... the outer ways cannot share segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.57355&lat=-37.70232&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The simplest thing to do?
Delete the relation.
Place the tag 'landuse=grass' on each way

Hi,
I have been adding gliding clubs to OSM.

To 'conform' to OSM tags .. I have removed 'clubhouse' from the name of one of the buildings and added tags for club, sport and website.
The aim is to make them all searchable using club and gliding.
A few missing as I cannot yet get even a rough location for them.

In this case there is only one mapped way around the whole thing ... with all of the tags on that. No relation.

If the individual segments require separation then add separate ways as building:part. Still no relation.

Shared segments in relation...

Learn how to do multipolygon relations .... ...................................................................................................

Relation relation/19795228 deleted - conflicts with
address nodes.
separation of buildings
only has role 'inners'.

Hi,
This construction is now finished? Can you confirm that the train route that use these lines under construction can now use them ... that they continue to use the same lines (the northern side of the station)???

These are ONLY buildings.
See landuse=farmyard

"An area of land WITH farm buildings"

Secondly the name of the farm should be placed on the total area of the farm not just the buildings or the farmyard...

relation/20165239 ... deleted.

A RELATION is NOT needed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Simply tag the ways.

This is NOT the way to make multipolygon relations!

Part revert

Part revert.

You are making problems!

Relation: 3019792 Not closed.

way/227239058 is empty.

Please FIX your own errors?

Hi,

I have made some changes to 'East Village - building part, m glass roof and garden. Issues with relations ... I have repaired the relations as best I could but you should look at them to check if I did something wrong? Changeset: 178650501

HI,

The tree relation/3834805 has 3 members with the incorrect roles... Take a look at
Way: 1470845270
Way: 1470845269
and
Way: 1470869002

Think you'll agree these should be 'outer'.