Looks great! Thanks for mapping

Thanks for mapping. Please map the entire building. If it's more than half in your square, you can go ahead and map it, if not, don't map it and leave it for the other square.

Thanks for mapping! Don't forget to click the q button on your keyboard, that will make the buildings have 90 degree corners

Thanks for mapping, it looks great! Keep it up

Hi there. Thanks for mapping. The "name" field is for the official name of something, not for a description. Also make sure to follow the HOT tasking manager instructions, if they say map only buildings, then make sure to stick to that. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks for mapping. When mapping bridges, make sure to use the existing road, don't add a new one on top of it. Here's more https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64873

Thanks for mapping. When mapping a bridge, make sure to use the existing road. Here is more of how to do it: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64873

Thanks for mapping! When adding bridges, make sure to use the existing road and don't add new duplicate segments. Here is more: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64873

Thanks for mapping! Please follow the project instructions, to tag buildings just as "building" and also use the Q button on you keyboard to make sure the corners are 90 degrees. Buildings aren't trapezoids generally.

I can’t tell. Could be block numbers too. It links like this user has local knowledge but added a lot of incorrect tags.

Thanks for the comment, sounds good.

Hi, please don't add fake data to the map

Olá. Notei que há um grande polígono da floresta amazônica no OSM sem tags que não parece muito preciso e dificulta o download de dados porque é muito grande: osm.org / way / 446564263

Eu estava pensando que seria melhor ter pequenos recursos como uma relação para a floresta, ou talvez algo mais, e isso polígono poderia ser excluído. O que você acha?

///

I noticed there is a large polygon of the Amazon forest on OSM with no tags which does not seem very accurate and makes it hard to download data because it's so big: way/446564263

I was thinking it would be better to have small features as a relation for the forest, or maybe something else, and this polygon could be deleted. What do you think?

Hello, I saw you recently edited this huge polygon: way/354918304 -- is it supposed to be something? It's so large it makes it hard to download things in the area and there are no tags on it, and it doesn't seem to be part of any relations. Thanks.

Thanks, you're right. This node was previously listed as a "hamlet" which is not correct. I'll delete it.

Hi, it looks like you added three large square buildings in the forest but I don't see them. Do they exist?

Ah, interesting! The closest major road is secondary (way/175127158) and that goes through Kaédi which is one of the largest cities in Mauritania. These villages look pretty small comparatively, so in my opinion it should be tertiary, even if it has been asphalted since it doesn't connect big places together.

Hi Severin. It seems like this road may be a little too rural and unimportant to be primary. It does not connect any of the bigger cities in the region, and looks unpaved. I think tertiary or secondary would be more appropriate, what do you think? Or maybe the imagery is outdated? Thanks!

Thank you!

Hi, this road doesn't match imagery here, can you take a look? way/372792034