OpenStreetMap
blackboxlogic's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 97605532 | I checked the website you linked as a reference: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/88687705
|
|
| 97508861 | Your edits would be much easier to review if you made many similar changes in the same changeset. I see two other users have requested the same thing from you.
|
|
| 97467253 | It seems unlikely that this building is named "private". I've changed them. If you want to change them back, please include a reference to where you found that name published.
|
|
| 97467205 | Seems odd to have addr: tags but not have addr:housenumber. I've made an adjustment here by merging the building with the address node.
|
|
| 97336477 | I added an address node. You added a building with the same address in the same place (which is far better). Instead of having two elements with the same address, please feel free to delete the address node as it isn't needed any longer (as long as the address details are on the new building).
|
|
| 97335188 | HI, thanks for your edits. You named way/894430736 "Owned by Town of Wells" but that doesn't sound like a name. Maybe consider "owner=Town of Wells" instead?
|
|
| 97257074 | Hi, thanks for adding buildings. In 2020, I added all the address nodes in Maine, but the buildings you're adding are much better. Any time you add a building, consider merging it with the address node so the node is gone and the address details are on the building. Please ask if you have questions. - Alex
|
|
| 97176534 | regarding "St. Stephen Drive", why not "Saint..."?
|
|
| 97114518 | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your much-needed improvements to Denmark roads. Please ask if you have any questions.
|
|
| 96922890 | Welcome to OSM! I've reviewed your first few edits and they look great! Please ask if you have questions.
|
|
| 96823854 | You deleted WAY: 822682396 (replacing it with WAY: 891343294) which has less information. Since the satellite imagery is old, I can't tell if that building really no longer exists. Please only delete things from OSM if they don't exist in the real world.
|
|
| 96823854 | Looks like you drew a new way (WAY: 891343293) over an existing way (duplicating it). My best guess is that you were trying to indicate that this way is designed for bikes. I've never been there so I don't know exactly what's going on, but If possible, I would add new properties to existing elements, or use "relations" to group elements into a single larger element (like a bike route). Please ask if you have questions. https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ is a great place to get help.
|
|
| 83748907 | Thanks for responding. I seems you were solely responsible for all 3 instances of "posted=yes" in all of OSM. I hope you don't mind that I've updated those to "source:access=sign". |
|
| 83748907 | What do you mean by "posted=yes"?
|
|
| 96783155 | Thanks for your edits. This year, I placed all the address nodes but the buildings you're adding are better. When you add a building, consider merging the address node with the building you added (if it's clear which one it belongs to). To merge to things, select them both and press C (for Combine).
|
|
| 96782143 | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. I've reviewing them and they look great. I think you may have intention only a portion of this to be a culvert?
|
|
| 96750222 | Yep, just confirming. Based on the satellite imagery, highway=track is more appropriate for many of these roads. Unclassified is somewhere you could use a normal car, probably paved.
|
|
| 96749201 | Some of the roads you've been working on seem like they might be logging roads. Consider: highway=track?
|
|
| 96737845 | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. We expand abbreviations in names. This one has already been corrected from "Ice House Ln." to "Ice House Lane".
|
|
| 95919284 | When a sign ends with "PVT" or "Private" that is not part of the name. |