dankarran's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152617803 | What was the need for deleting the piers here?
|
|
| 152647465 | Why did the breakwater need deleting here? |
|
| 153438335 | Why did you replace a harbour outline with a single point here? It seems like a backwards step?
|
|
| 156685363 | Why have you deleted the additional 2.5D building part outlines? |
|
| 156151264 | Any idea what the two circular objects are in the southwestern end of the playground? Picnic tables maybe? Fountains? |
|
| 155286416 | Hi Ralf, welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like you've accidentally moved the war memorial to a different location with this edit, but I've moved it back now. |
|
| 154885686 | Thanks for the confirmation. Great to see all your contributions by the way! |
|
| 154885686 | Is this postbox mounted in the wall or on a pole? |
|
| 154569008 | Thanks for that fix. What about the footpath connection between Spinney Close and Copse Hill?
(ps - as a cyclist I want all these kind of connections to be cycleable, but without explicit signage I don't think that's usually the case) |
|
| 154563688 | "Cyclists are reminded that cycling in Strand Street, Castle Street and Duke Street contravenes the Douglas General Bylaws 2013."
|
|
| 154563688 | "Under the local authority's byelaws cyclists caught riding in Strand Street, Castle Street and Duke Street can receive a fine of up to £2,500."
"No person shall cycle, skate on roller skates, a skateboard, rollers or wheels or any similar device on any footway or pavement in such a manner as to cause danger or annoyance to any person."
|
|
| 154563688 | Can I just check what the source is for stating that bikes are allowed on these pedestrian roads? I've checked a few spots on Mapillary (2020) and Bing (2018) but can't spot anything that explicitly allowed bikes at that point in time. |
|
| 153295585 | Thanks for checking - I'll make sure to take Companies Registry changes with a pinch of salt |
|
| 152917120 | Enjoy your visit :) |
|
| 152917120 | The postboxes used to just have a simple integer number above the location name, but maybe that's been phased out. IM00000023IM may be the original 23? |
|
| 152538832 | Fair enough. I've only ever been through on foot without paying attention to the gate rules. |
|
| 152538832 | If permissive doesn't quite fit here, access=private is probably better than access=no |
|
| 152294824 | Remember that OpenStreetMap shouldn't be used just for bookmarking places (even if they do good vegetarian food :), but if it is a real place, it'd be great if you could add some more details so the edit can be verified by locals. Happy editing! |
|
| 152294824 | Thanks for the addition. Please could you just confirm the name Douglasia? I can't find any other information about the place online... |
|
| 150560090 | What an odd numbering scheme! |