DWG revert - revert vandalism edits from sock puppet account

changeset/177634990

Hi, looks like there's a typo in the house number for way/1467491633
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177281864

Hi there, this looks pretty good, only thing would be that if 2 and 4 Winchester Street don't share a wall, they shouldn't be joined together. If iD is wanting to snap them together, I'm happy to help fix that with JOSM or another editor.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177202796

Hi, the section you've marked as service, is this just a one lane section? If so, it should probably still be residential and just tagged as a single lane.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177130181

Hi, you've attached the corner of way/1465772868 to the park next to it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177048763

Hi, when you're drawing buildings, it's a good idea to click the building outline once you've drawn it, and then press Q to square it off.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177050198

Hi there, for the changeset comment, it's better to describe what you're actually changing, otherwise it's not really giving any information to anyone. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments has some good examples.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177053624

Hi, the wikidata tag should use the Q ID, not the name of the item.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177069754

I've fixed them up in changeset/176962528 for an example of how building=house should be drawn.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176939353

Hi, since there's no physical split in the road, this shouldn't be mapped as two separate sections. Painted islands aren't counted for physical splits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176847619

I agree with JoeG, just because the terminology is American, it doesn't make the tag invalid and is commonly used in Australia. Those footway=sidewalk tags should all be restored.

On the split road, that really comes down to local preference. For a small island like that I generally wouldn't bother, but it's something that might be worth a discussion in the forum to see if there's a preference one way or the other.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176551989

Is "office=game development" a commonly used tag? I don't think it really is, this should probably go back to office=it, and a relevant sub-tag added if one exists.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176693411

Hi, you've added these as just name=Sump, what are these actually meant to be? The name tag is for signed names, not descriptive names.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176285210

The name is what I'm asking about, because if Extension isn't what is signed or part of the actual name, it shouldn't be included.

Is the new road actually named Ison Road Extension, or is it just an extension of Ison Road?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176163579

Is Aston Hills actually a suburb, or just the name of that residential development? You haven't mentioned a source other than aerial imagery, something like this really needs one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176135487

Hi, Bing Imagery shows the driveway on the other side of the building, did you use different imagery for this or should this be corrected?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175970625

All good, it happens!

Hi, you've added these tags to the building for the office, not to the caravan park site itself. The building and office tags should be restored, and the name, brand:*, addr:*, tourism and website tags should go on the way covering the whole park.

The colon should be before the two slashes, I'll correct it for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175790635