Yeah, I can definitely agree with that as well. I’ve changed a few rules in the bot so that it now tends to revert changes back to the previous tags instead of trying to detect spammy tags and remove them individually. Let’s see how well that approach works out. 🙂

Hi Mateusz Konieczny,

I’m not sure what’s going on here, but some of your map edits seem to have been reverted after your revert.

Best regards,
Pascal

Hi bartgron,

I’m not sure what’s going on here, but some of your map edits seem to have been reverted after your revert.

Best regards,
Pascal

Partly reverted by changeset/179771389

Partly reverted by changeset/179771308

Partly reverted by changeset/179771461

IMHO, yes.

Do you see any copyright notices or terms of use on the satellite imagery there?

How to change the description using the iD editor:
1. Go to openstreetmap.org and log in.
2. Click Edit (this opens the iD editor).
3. Navigate to your business location.
4. Click Point and place it on the correct building/location.
5. In the left panel, choose the appropriate presets/tags
6. Add the necessary information:
description=*
7. Click Save, add a short changeset comment, and upload.

Thanks @iandees

Hi Pikse,

I’m not sure what’s going on here, but some of your map edits seem to have been reverted after your revert.

Best regards,
Pascal

Partly reverted by changeset/179763357

Partly reverted by changeset/179763310

Partly reverted by changeset/179763310

👍 Thank you @juulCoding04

Hello,

You can see the "crossings" in the following two ways, which now appear to be duplicates:
way/1488045321
way/964990984

In my opinion, only one of these ways should exist.

I hope this helps clarify the issue.

And again:
way/21421432
way/1488047842
way/21421534

Same again. Please check these ways:
way/1317024863
way/1488045676

Hello, thanks for your answer.

However, with this changeset several crossings appear to have been created unintentionally. You can see this by comparing the following two ways:

way/1488045321
way/964990984

Could you please review and correct these crossings?

Thanks.

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

Same again, I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history.

Best regards.

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

Same again, I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history.

Best regards.