In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. I have checked the mentioned elements and can confirm that the current configuration is valid.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

Sorry, the last comment what not correct, it should be:

🚫 Text removed by changeset/176205432
Thanks @user_5359

Do you mean node/10559845231

Thanks for your reply.

Thanks for your reply.

(Partly) Revert of changeset/175946335

(Partly) reverted by changeset/176298383

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history. Thanks again for helping improve the map.

Best regards.

Looks legit.

Thank you for your reply.
Looks good.

Looks legit.

Thank you for your reply.
Looks good.

Thank you for your reply.
Looks good.

Thank you for your reply.
Looks good.

User has been blocked, see osm.org/user_blocks/19194

Thank you, Vinber

Should be fixed by changeset/176121116

👍 Thank you

Reverted by changeset/176160091

Reverted by changeset/176160091

Thanks, impiaaa