Thank you for your reply.

Thank you for your detailed review, @SomeoneElse

Thank you for your detailed review, @SomeoneElse

Thank you for your reply.

Fixed by changeset/177047714

Thanks @nevw

In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

Fixed by changeset/177031752

Thanks @AylinJellybean

Thank you for your map edits.
Looks good!

Best regards,
Pascal

Perfect, Bernard!

Thanks also for removing the spammy description.

All the best,
Pascal

PS: Sorry that I didn’t write your name correctly in the first comment.

changeset/176971343
changeset/176994414

Bernhard, thank you.

I think we should also separate the added POI from the relation mentioned here, correct?

Reverted by changeset/176214045

Reverted by changeset/176214045

Reverted by changeset/176214045

Hallo, danke für die Antwort.
So wie bei den letzten Malen?

#KeepTheHistory

Hi, thanks for your contribution!

I noticed you deleted and redrew some features instead of editing the existing ones. In OpenStreetMap, it’s usually better to adjust the geometry of existing objects rather than replacing them completely.

This way we keep the history, preserve any important tags, and avoid breaking relations like routes or boundaries. Redrawing can accidentally remove valuable details and make it harder for others to track changes.

For future edits, please try to move or reshape the existing nodes instead of deleting them, this helps maintain OSM’s data quality and history. Thanks again for helping improve the map.

Best regards.

Reverted by changeset/176861519

Reverted by changeset/176264474

Hallo,

wenn es nur ein Test war, wird dann das "Test" Attribut auch wieder entfernt?

Danke.

In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts. I have checked the mentioned elements and can confirm that the current configuration is valid.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

Thank you.