Found also some spammy entries or descriptions within this changeset ...

You're welcome.

Ein paar der Änderungen (Wege) dieses Changesets wurden in einem Bereich auf Basis der Kommentare aufgeräumt.

changeset/177800556

In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

Thanks for the detailed explanation and for taking the time to respond, much appreciated.

Cheers,
Pascal

👍

Please see changeset/177618912

Hi Phil,

thanks a lot for the detailed explanation.

I’m by no means a legal expert, but I was wondering whether the OGL is actually compatible with OSM’s ODbL license?

In addition, I’d be interested in your view on how useful it is to store external reference IDs directly in OSM. In Germany this has only worked to a limited extent in one case, and in other cases I remember more critical voices than supporters when similar references were discussed.

Best regards,
Pascal

Hi Phil,

just a quick question: I noticed UPRN references added here and was wondering about the data source and whether licensing was considered.

Please let me know if I’m missing something.

Many thanks!

Pascal

👍 TrickyFoxy

Yep

In this case, it seems the reported issues are false positives. The geometries were not changed in a way that would introduce crossings, and the tagging adjustments did not create any new conflicts.

Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks again for your map edits.

Regards,
Pascal

Hi, just a test?

Hi, just a test?

Hi, just a test?

Hi, just a test?

Reverted by changeset/177636310

Thanks, @eggie

Thank you for the update 👍

The description is already much more neutral. However, the detailed list of services (SEO, SEA, Social Ads, etc.) is still quite close to promotional / SEO-style content and does not really add useful information for the map and its users.

A simpler wording such as “Digital marketing agency” or “Digital marketing consultancy” would be more appropriate for OSM.

Best regards,
Pascal

Reverted by changeset/177636928