OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
166885132

"dirt path" appears to be an (un-needed) description not a name, osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166885132

166884884

Were you trying to map a building here? Tagging as name=building is not the correct way to do this, please see building=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166884884

158646418

Is the reference that you added for the bridge or the road? If for the bridge it should be tagged bridge:ref (see bridge=*#Bridge_numbers). See also note/4703942

166555473

Manukau Harbour has been correctly tagged as relation/8534169 for 7 years. This looks more like tagging for the renderer. Also is "Second-hand Books" the actual name (looks to be a description) or is it "The Open Book" as per https://theopenbook.co.nz/ ?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166555473

165702205

Hi the changeset mapped cycle-way lanes as separate ways, this should only be done where there is a physical barrier between the lanes

165356847

Instead of tagging areas of the school as 'landuse=grass' recommended practice is to use 'landuse=recreation ground' and 'surface=grass' as per amenity=school#Single_school_on_one_site.

Also instead of drawing multiple adjacent areas of the same type it is good practice to create a multipolygon and and cut out any different areas by making them `role=inner`

165508295

This changeset added a cycle path (way/1381663352) but this is an un-separated cycle lane on the road, which by convention is not drawn as a separate way. Instead such lanes are simply tagged on the road which was already done

165599015

Your changeset has show the section linking the Waterview Shared path and Laurel Street as reopened and yet only has the LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery as a source. This was updated because this section was fenced off and closed (as per Mar-2025 Mapillary imagery). Can you confirm it has really been reopened again?

164611707

Reverted for fantasy mapping

changeset/164656616

164611707

From the aerial imagery this appears to be a residential house and I can find no such branch at https://mcdonalds.co.nz/find-us/restaurants. Can you confirm this really exists?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164611707

163511908

Please use descriptive changeset comments as per osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Also the name field should be for proper names only: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163511908

158439187

Thanks, reverted

161294110

Some accidental arifact from editing, I've removed it

163152838

This duplicates the node you created in changeset #163152569
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163152838

163180795

Why have you tagged this section of road as a ford? It does not match the changeset description or the aerial imagery
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163180795

162874415

Please use meaningful changeset comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162874415

162635294

What do you mean by "The triangle is not valid" that you keep using in your changset descriptions?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162635294

162521013

Your changeset comment says "wrong name" but all you did was delete the name, what is the correct name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162521013

162482313

What is your source for the name "Bikanervala Indian Sweets, Restaurant & Takeaway"? Their website certainly makes it seem like the previous name of "Bikanervala" is correct and the new name appears to have been edited to include descriptive elements, which you have been asked not to do multiple times
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162482313

162472526

Please use descriptive changeset comments - you have been asked multiple times to do this and you continue to create changesets with either very brief or non existent comments.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also this changeset abbreviated a lot of bus stop names, please don't do this, the standard in OSM is to avoid abbreviations and contractions.
osm.wiki/Abbreviations

Please take the time to read the feedback that is being left on your changesets and reply.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162472526