This appears to be vandalism, please revert
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532904

This appears to be vandalism, please revert
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532686

This appears to be vandalism, please revert
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532529

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally the preferred way to map sidewalks in NZ is to add sidewalk tags to the associated road as per osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_refinement_to_a_highway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95444535

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. You have changed the wagiing on way/328914342 to building=no. Are you trying to indicate there is no building there? If so the correct way is to remove the way itself rather than change the tagging. Alternatively if it is just not a building then the tagging should be changed to refelect what it is
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95443923

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. When adding pgone numbers please use ITU-T E.164 format as per phone=*#Usage
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95443869

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits but this changeset has multiple issues: You have removed the building tag and added an area tag to a building which is not how buildings are tagged in OSM; you have used a long hand description tag instead of amenity=doctors; you have dragged an address node onto the road way; phone numbers should use ITU-T E.164 format (use a leading +64, drop the leading 0); Saint should be expanded rather than abbreviated St. Please see the wiki at osm.wiki/ for guidance on OSM mapping. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95079081

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Please don't use generic names/descriptions like "Commercial area" in the name field: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=en#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95022314

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, unfortunately it has multiple issues: a node for 16 Shropshire Ave already exists; add ress nodes shouldn't be placed on the road way; address nodes aren't tagged like this, see addr=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95017177

Please do not put generic names/descriptions in the name field: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95008104

Concur with coykoi, these are descriptions not names: name=*

Why are you removing driveways? They are perfectly valid mapping
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94973960

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. There are some problems with this changeset: 1) Highwic is already mapped as a building way and tagged historic; 2) historic=Historic_mansion is a non standard tagging, typical use would be historic=building (see historic=*), 3) You have used the inscription key for a description (unless that test is actually physically inscribed on the building)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94860858

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Generally the practice in NZ is to map sidewalks by adding sidewalk=both|left|right tags to the road way rather than drawing as seperate ways. This make it much easier to maintain a topology suitable for routing. See sidewalk=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94800441

Please don't use descriptions like "Coast to Coast path (Epsom Ave thru Auckland University and Melville Park to Gillies Ave)" in the name field. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94666033

This changset wrongly dragged a node of Lower Domain Drive onto Wellesly Strteet. Please look out for warning from the Id editor - there are 20 for this changeset

This changeset has moved an address node into the road and dragged another node, reverting
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94411013

Winchester is already properly mapped as an area, removing

Why have you added layer=1 to the two buildings? Is it an attempt to correct warnings about crossing the river? Because it appears the river is position wrongly
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94401304

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. There is no need to add a POI for the Fresh Choice supermarket here as it has been on the map for ~5 years, node/3436746945 Also in OSM the convention is not to put the location ("Mangere Bridge") in the name: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=en#Name_is_the_name_only
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94014310