From your changeset comment, I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is there anything I can do to help?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178958250

From your changeset comment, I'm not sure what you are trying to accomplish. Is there anything I can do to help?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178958250

#TIP: Descriptive name like name=Residence are not used. Tags can do the trick. I removed the name tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178950256

DWG here - can you show where on the wiki you documented this mass change?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178947319

For future imports, please follow the wiki guidelines at osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178229093

Instead of deleting then adding the buildings back, it is better to just update the existing outline. Doing so will keep the history intact.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177571644

Se pare că în această editare, precum și în altele, clădirile trebuie să fie pătrate. Pentru a pătra clădirea, selectați conturul, apoi tastați pur și simplu „q”. Încercați să potriviți linia acoperișului cu conturul clădirii.

in English:
It appears on this edit as well as other that buildings need to be squared. To square the building, select the outline then just type a "q". Try to match the roof line to the building outlines.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177580060

El problema con un uso del suelo tan extenso como este es que probablemente haya zonas comerciales y minoristas, lo que requiere una relación para poder añadirlo con precisión.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177484027

the trouble with large landuse like this is that there is likely retail and commercial areas which then requires a relation to accurately add.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177484027

Instead of deleting and adding the features back, just redraw the object. This save the history of the object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177327772

I know this is a old edit, but instead of deleting the old feature, just adjust the polygon and add/corrects the tags. That saves the history of the object.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173301159

If you go to the counties imap parcels, zoom into the area, then on the left hand side open the layer and select show addresses. While they don't have buildings, they do have addresses where buildings are located.

Nice addition. I added sidewalks and addresses using the counties parcel data. I suspect there is a crossing at the start of 34th street but can you confirm?

It was the DAV Construction LLC node.

Thanks for asking. When you save and upload an edit follow the guidance at osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

Basically, just leave a brief description of what you did.

Instead of deleting the building, just change the tags to the correct tags. In this case building=roof + layer=1. I went ahead and added it back.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178841676

It looks like you added the same device twice. Can you review this edit to make sure the devices are accurate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178839305

Please add a changeset comment when uploading. This may help you and others in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178834607

The bot made the node look like a regular business, but it just looks like a private house. I doubt they would want people showing up 24 hours a day, but that is what may happen. I would have deleted this node.

Why did you add access=private? It should be posted as no trespassing. If it is privately maintain then ownership=private would be more approriate.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178792034