Please don't accuse "vandalistic" when this is a suspected act. Don't change `old_name=` to `name=` without discussion.

Please upload your edits in the same area together. Don't update 1 object per changeset. changeset/176728421

@kingkingHK No, it's another attribute. `opening_hours=` is not fully standard for `access=` and `highway=` open=*

2. You confused 397 ("Prison") and 399 ("Correctional Institution")
3. Please use meaningful upload comments

Please don't remove `amenity=` + `name=`

Please don't remove, or delete other `building=`

Please upload your edits in the same area together. Don't update 1 object per changeset.

1. Please don't remove other names. All are valid.
2. `name=` is the commonly used one, not `official_name=`
3. Please don't base your arguement solely from copying other maps. This violates copyright.

3. No, it can contradict the Categories rule, even for what's in fact 3 corridors with 2 east-west. You should not use `route=` simply for this. It's not a transport planning policy tool. It's for reflecting a signposted, official, or numbered one.

1.1. No, the ground truth principle can't be disproved. As I said, the standard and expectation for `route=` is higher. Even if you want to argue it's commonly used by people, it's unable to be distinguished whether it's proper, or a descriptor as a category.
1.2. So as I said, can you give other examples of such "x of y" for you arguement? You seem to be assuming they are used, but they aren't the norm.
2. Then what's the purpose of creating this? On the contrary, `highway=footway` + `network=` would be more widely and easily visible, supported, and used.

1. This is not my "personal preference". I'm explaining to you on the `route=` , not other `highway=` roads. Wuhu St Underpass is used on traffic notices, and Schedule of Routes, to refer to the road. "Footbridge System" is a specific set of interconnected footbridges, but is at least not a `route=` , and not rigorously a `network=` either.
2. Seems I didn't make it clear both are unacceptable

1. This is a `route=` , which has higher expectations and standards
2. Do you have other examples? Such prepositions are almost never correct.

That's Nominatim's fault. It overwrites the `admin_level=` with the `label` `place=` `address_rank:` counterintuitively. Has already been worked around with `admin_centre` yesterday. Need to wait for it to update or something.

This section is embanked, not bridged continuously. You can see the joint easily on the span across Lin Cheung Rd on the east.

2. The street naming isn't very useful, and it's quite unique to HK. `street:name=` should be enough for gazetted street, and `=motorway_link` can be named by interchanges.

This should not be followed, as it's inconsistent. Eg Rt 3 ends on an Exit in WHC. It may be taken to mean the km measuring only.

1. If there's not a signposted or official extent, it should not be added
2. I don't understand what your "x in/at/on/of y" is referring to

The slip roads are made `=motorway` for the existing status (cf TMCLK, TKOLTT)

Please don't delete `area:highway=`

1. Please discuss this first before changing all of them. They are 25kV_ac KCR sizes, built as mainline national rail, and functions as suburban trains. The existing compromise is to use `route=subway` on the `railway=rail`
2. The `route=` already has `colour=`