Sammyhawkrad's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 179995286 | Hi Escapade6850, if the shop has moved, you should move the node to the new location rather than removing tags. If it's already added at the new location, you should delete the old one. |
|
| 179973155 | Hi XXTENTATION, the name=* tag is used for official or recognised name of places. Using descriptions such as "field" is discouraged. Similarly, operator=* also takes a name. Physical tags such as amenity=bank or leisure=pitch describe what the object is, so it's unnecessary to add that as names. |
|
| 179895010 | Hi Samuel Asante, use building=yes to map buildings. area=yes doesn't mean anything. |
|
| 179863669 | Hi puplampu, don't use descriptions in the name=* tag. "uncompleted building" isn't a name. |
|
| 179835512 | Hi ERIC TWUM-UEW, it's bad practice to trace over existing objects and give them the same tags. There's no use for that. From recent imagery, there is a building here instead. |
|
| 179768804 | Hi ERIC TWUM-UEW, welcome to OSM. Please don't add duplicate ways to existing roads. |
|
| 179758600 | Hi Kingsford1234, the name Papa Joe Stadium covers the entire sports facilities, and has already been added. No need to add it to the pitch again, so I will remove it. |
|
| 168527183 | Hi BigKev97, that's a name, not a date, so changing it to match a date format is incorrect. Your changes have been reverted by changeset/179707497 |
|
| 179194320 | Hi Kingenious, welcome to OSM. Please use Title Case for names instead of BLOCK LETTERS. |
|
| 178605297 | I'm glad you realise your mistake now. As I mentioned earlier, there are neighbourhoods within these suburbs that are yet to be mapped.
|
|
| 179168008 | Hi Godfred_uew, it seems you enjoy using UPPER CASE a lot, but note that this is against OSM convention. You can look everywhere else on the map and notice that you are the only one doing that. The name=* tag should always be in the title case except for acronyms. |
|
| 178853883 | Hi adam@1234, welcome to OSM. Note that most, if not all, major roads are already mapped. Before you map a road, check whether one already exists. The name=* tag is for official road names. Avoid using tags you don't understand yet. |
|
| 178753243 | Hello Aliu_Paul, don't add amenity=school to every building. There is one amenity=school polygon mapped for the entire school, and that should be enough.
|
|
| 178729719 | Hi NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF, you request a review for every changeset, but you don't heed the feedback. You should map each building separately; mapping a cluster of buildings as a single unit is not good practice. |
|
| 178302222 | Somehow, your reply notification landed in my spam, and I'm only seeing this now. There is no doubt that there were errors in those changes you reverted. I have fixed several of them after restoring the changes, and I agree way/1475246797 is not correctly mapped. It's not a path I would add to the map, and I believe it is okay to delete it outright.
My concern was that it's better to fix the mistakes than to erase valuable information that came along with them. |
|
| 178694814 | Hello NACHINDI _ ABDUL _RAUF, map each building separately. Mapping a cluster of buildings as single buildings is not proper mapping. |
|
| 178605297 | Once again, my apologies. I had no intention of spamming you; it just turned out I had further concerns after submitting a comment. |These are streets with street names that do not allow vehicle traffic, versus simple footpaths.|
| Footpaths often do not get rendered downstream |
|Deleted church: Pls identify via node id|
|suburbs vs neighborhoods - pls look at the definition for each|
| As an example - La is definitely a suburb, places like Ringway Estates, North Ridge and Asylum Down are NOT. |
|A cluster of "suburb" nodes will only render one node in almost ALL downstream clients.|
|Building=part has to be in a relation for it to be valid|
| I don't map for a specific downstream client, so I'm not "mapping for the renderer" - I'm just trying to make sure that these areas and districts actually show up!|
|
|
| 178605297 | I'm sorry, but the more I look into this changeset, the more issues I find. Although valuable street names have been added, it will be a pain to nitpick and fix the data damage introduced in this changeset. I believe reversing this changeset would be the best solution. As a non-local, why do you downgrade suburbs to neighbourhoods? And why do you remove details of the transport network relations? |
|
| 178605297 | I notice that you've also deleted a church; any reason for that? |
|
| 178605297 | Hello Greg_Rose, you've added a number of footpaths here with the tag highway=pedestrian. I think highway=footway or highway=path would be more suitable. |