Yes, please go ahead... on your inspirational tour you might get passed L'Aquila... The eagle. ;o)

ciao

Since you were the last to touch these outlines, islands too have multiple, 'assumed' you may not have checked the other relations, Turns out another mapper touched on the same relations and forgot about the larger ones. He fixed it after a general ping on the community forums.

cheers

Hi,

Did you verify those admin relations are whole and complete? Currently and same as a couple of week ago e.g. the main one shows as broken in OSM Inspector and if loaded into OSM, the missing parts show in absence of red line highlighting. Please see

relation/4016746#map=12/45.2530/14.3760

(Possibly this is may have been caused by the same mapper who was doing data imports and broke the Adriatic Sea, in amongst half a dozen other boundaries and coastlines which we noticed in Italy too.

ciao

Hi,

railway=disused/abandoned... hmmm, oh yes, the supplemental disused:railway=rail says it pertains to the rail part. Was recently made aware that lifecycle tags for certain objects/parts are to be placed on a separate tag rather than a prefix... think it was on the community forum so I'll get to that when I'll get to that and checking back had completely forgotten about it, 3 years ago did it right changeset/108043691

Anyway, In fact, razed is closer to the truth for the sections that have gone under the cycleway paving like most, for sure it will never ever be reinstated as a railway.

Got the same between Ortona and Vasto (now that is a really really nice cycleroute on the sea border). Dutch will love it as it often gives a nice stiff breeze either going SE or NW blazing over the Adriatic.. put your factor 50 on. Temp differences between sea and land can really amplify that effect.

These rails mostly better to be placed on the OHM site is my opinion, somewhere external to standard OSM.

A mapper complaint recently running a double flat because he tried to cycle on a remaining 1.5km piece where the rock bed was still there but absolutely everything else removed....you need to swap to the SS16 primary and pray while traversing there, heavy lorries racing by, actually now routing there, but recommend to better push bike that stretch along the old track. Don't know the history why that part is not done up. 3m wide cycleway stops dead and then continues 1.5km further on, 3m wide.

Also Sangritana between Lanciano and Casoli and on is thoroughly abandoned, sections truly gone but still tagged as disused. A mapper went about few months ago restoring the level crossings again as were they operational. Some hardware (lights, liftgates, signals is still there in severe dilapidated state and some crossings have no binaries to see, just asphalt... ah yes reminds me of Ortona - Orsogna... in practical terms gone but a few relics and yet still tagged as disused, As said, the local rail aficionados can put their teeth in on those.

Maybe was:railway tag... there's 4K use on TagInfo (no wiki, lots of tag combos), At any rate, I let mostly the rail aficionados worry about that, the local community that is, long as it does not conflict with the rests of the way routing which it did when I made that change, think around the time when I mapped the 3100km Appennino Bike Tour route in 44+1 stages... The 1 having a part actually traveling by rail to the ferry port going to Messina- Sicily. relation/17814924.
Was a few weeks of work including resolving routing issues. You need some really good legs for sections like Torre to Passo San Leonardo on to Rivisondoli

cheers

Hi.

There's no name conflict here "on the ground", even one of the 7 wall signs had a recent paint refresh to indicate its secondo tratto.
. Ciao

Ciao,

Perché hai eliminato questo nodo di hamlet. node/3924006274/history. Come già notato nel mio altro commento su CS, se elimini oggetti devi spiegare nei tuoi commenti su CS. Ci sono anche i tag del ciclo di vita. Se un edificio esisteva ed è stato demolito, devi contrassegnarlo come demolished:building=yes per indicare ad altri mappatori che non è più lì, così non lo ricreeranno in base a immagini obsolete che potrebbero utilizzare.

Saluti

E perché hai cancellato queste informazioni?
way/1311801945

Ciao

Ti prego di SMETTERE di eliminare oggetti, modificarli e altro senza commentare specificamente nel tuo set di modifiche PERCHÉ stai eliminando oggetti. Se non sai come riparare qualcosa che hai rotto, usa il pulsante di annullamento in alto a destra, ma non salvare oggetti che hai rotto.

(Hi,

Kindly STOP deleting objects, mangling them and more without specifically commenting in your edit set WHY you are deleting object. If you do not know how to fix something you broke use the reverse button right top, but don't save objects you broke.)

Grazie

Ciao,

Alcune correzioni al tuo tagging:
changeset/162776672

Don't know why that papyrus info was deleted and turned into a single plant with 1 tag... you may want to check with the deleter as to why. changeset/162507642

errata: The video is attached to this object way/1311955083#map=18/42.316141/13.310682

Hi,

Apologies. The longer viaduct in the motorway section, Fornaca west, was blown up in 2022 for a new one, seismic proof, video in my edit. Nobody bothered to adapt the road routing and accesses till now, so I did. By the looks it will be still a while, the Fornaca east now oneway=no . It's not an extremely busy motorway so the usual, taking their time. Forgot about FB routes.

Mea Maxima Culpa
cheers

Hi,

Is there now somewhere a place holder node to carry all these area tags... my overpass can't seems to find any, and Adriatic I've never heard of being a contentious name.

chrs

Since I still had the data set from last week, just refreshed that coastline section, then seeing there were border imports along that coastline breaking at least 5 area relation, done by the CS prior to Filo's doing by this account @Import%20DGU%20borders, few hundred edit, guaranteed success. This is 1 mapper scale above me.

Hi,

Actually think that Filo edit should have been reverted as the Adriatic coastline boundary is broken in the Volosko corner in multiple sections, since highlighted in OSM Inspector. Not a week ago I spent hours loading the Adriatic relations to correct it, most time wasted on loading the whole A relation into JOSM memory to verify all was properly closed. Oh will, version 1011 now, mopping with the watertap open.

ciao

Ciao, ho corretto la relazione del Castello in modo che tutto appaia correttamente, tranne per il fatto che c'era un conflitto di etichette del sidewalk sull'edificio del castello che ho dovuto rimuovere. Sospetto che il sidewalk o il camminamento dovessero seguire lungo la parte superiore delle mura del castello. Sicuramente deve essere disegnato separatamente. Così sai, come ultimo editore della relazione del castello. Le modifiche che puoi trovare in questo CS:

changeset/161670716

saluti

Is the crossing here on a traffic_calming=table ???

Hi,

Don't know why you keep adding nodes to circles, buildings, watertowers, roundabouts, wastewater clarifiers and the like over and above what the editors auto-calculate depending on the size of the ring as good enough to get a fluid round ring in map rendering, but it's being noticed. Adds zero value to the map.

cheers

PS There's the record keeper who put 400 on a larger roundabout... I apply reversal or simplify, only when I stumble on them ,O)

Hi,

You're the third person to revert cycleways/roads this same mapper has imported from GPX top of existing ways. Wrote him a note, got a reply back seemingly not understanding. This looks an awful lot like he did the same tracks again.

cheers

ciao,

alcune correzioni della tua modifica

changeset/161978347#map=19/42.600515/14.072403

felice mappatura