OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
179640075

Why delete the `=service` road?

179640507

Why deleting `highway=` and `building=` + `addr:housenumber=` ?

179640618

There's no need to move both `highway=` roads and `building=`

179640815

Very obvious mistake of mistakenly attaching vertex. Don't delete details, and changing to simplistic shapes.

179640867

Why deleting the details, and changing it to right-angled corners?

179641001

N-th deleting `building=` without even changing to `building:part=`

179641184

Why are you touching `tunnel=yes` + `layer=-1`, and what does this do?

179641341

1. Roads passing through buildings common situation
2. You simply moved it outside the `landuse=residential` again to other side

179497024

The suggestion is to distinguish by `maxspeed:type=` `=sign` vs `=HK` (`=HK:urban` etc are wrong), not removing `maxspeed=`

179641641

Why are you moving the `building=` , but then delete the `=service` road?

179641708

Why are you deleting a unique `addr:housenumber=` ?

179641988

2. Buildings overhanging roads are common

179642422

Again deleting without even trying to change them to `building:part=`

179654057

changeset/179642577

179642577

Why are you deleting `building:part=` ?

179642629

There's nothing wrong here. Only not fully shared 1 vertex with `=park`

179642692

Please connect buildings attached together, not move them minusculely away. I have noted `apartments=terraced`

179642895

What are you trying to do here? Much deleting, and changed Hong Tin House shape by attaching vertex.

179643060

They are attached together in reality, and actually further overlaps vertically. There's nothing wrong with this in terms of standard OSM data layout either.

179643621

You don't even choose to change to `building:part=` for the `name=` (`building=` is used as they are recognized as different buildings, and each tower can have its `building:part=` which can't be grouped together in between )